These charts display the daily dynamics of total data incrypted in ordinals in breakdown by Information and Virtual information size.

Virtual information size doesn't follow the Information size pattern. Over the time Information size has a downtrend whereas Virtual information size looks more stable over the time.

The fisrt inscriptions took in total much more information size which can be tied to majority of minted inscriptions represented as images on early stages. Although it doens't impacted Virtual information size

Chart on the left presents daily fees in BTC spent on minting ordinals whereas one on the right shows cumulative value of fees in BTC and USD over the time.

During the mint process users spent in total almost 2000 BTC(54 millions $) with highly pronounced peak at 7-8th May though this sharp increase wasn't reflected in the high number of minted inscriptions.

On may 7th fees from inscription mints consisted 61% of total paid fees

These charts show how much ordinals transaction takes out of all transaction on BTC as well as share of paid fees for mint transaction execution.

During the time transactions that involves inscription mints takes more share of total bitcoin transactions reaching up to 67%.

The same current share of ordinals transactions in blockchain as it was in May brings less share of total paid fees. Todays share of fees remains approximately the same .

Charts above are the breakdown of minted inscriptions. The right one shows the total distribution of minted inscriptions whereas left display it in daily dynamics.

Firstly users prefer to mint images. Starting from the March they have minted text inscriptions more. For now text inscriptions take almost 95% of all. Images and applications are ranked second and third respectively.

These charts show the distribution of unique minters by the inscription type they have minted.

Despite the existing imbalance in minted inscriptions by type the number of image and text minters is distributed almost equally. After a short pause in the end of April image minters became active again in second half of May.

It's worth noticing that there are represented some unusual single peaks of application minters activity. With daily active a few dozens of minters this number some days reached up to 2.5k .

Charts above display the distribution of paid fees in BTC for mint of specific inscriptions in daily dynamics and in total.

Text inscriptions take the first place by paid fees and amounted to 84%. In addition almost all inscriptions on period when the total fees were at its peak were text.

Unlike Information size text inscriptions take in total 60% of virtual information size.

Its clearly visible that text takes more virtual information size in comparison to information size

Charts above show the cumulative number of unique minters and minted inscriptions over the time.

Up to 11th April image was the leading type of ordinals by total number of mints. Starting from the end of April text type of ordinals rushed forward rapidly. Since then the number of image inscriptions have only twiced its number whereas text consists almost 95% of all minted ordinals.

Cumulative minters chart has the similar pattern. The number of image minters was consistently increasing till the sharp raise of text minters in the end of April.

These charts present the distribution of incrypted data incrypted in ordinals in dynamics as well as in total.

its notable that on March 9th video inscriptions took more than half of all information size while video was only around 3% of all inscriptions for that particular day

Images take more than 53% of all information size whereas text inscriptions take 60% of virtual information size.

Section above represents the top15 wallets who minted inscriptions and distribution of their paid fees for inscriptions mints.

Also you can see the table of top traders on marketplaces with gained profit in BTC. The first to wallets are solid leaders by made profit(215 and 180 BTC in total) whereas the following addresses made less than 50 BTC.

These charts represents ordinals sales on different marketplaces. The left one shows actual

Ordinals sales were peaked at May - mid June with all time highes at points higher than 17k and 22k. Since then the number of sales were slightly decreasing whereas traded volume had a sharp decline on Juky 15th. Starting from that time volume decreases towards zero.

Firstly ordinals sales were mostly on Ordswap and Ordinals wallet. Around 2 weeks in May UniSat has a major number of sales which generated the most volume till the big player MagicEden took all the traffic.