📑Introduction

Osmosis is a fair-launched AMM protocol for interchain assets that aims to allow the development and management of a self-balancing, noncustodial, interchain token index. Automated market maker (AMM) allows the digital asset to get traded in an automatic and permissionless manner.

⚙️Method

This dashboard will answer the following questions in four sections:

• How has the ratio of liquid to staked OSMO changed over time?
• Are the top 100 OSMO holders the same now as they were at the start of the year?
• What is the current average OSMO per wallet? How has that value changed over time? Plot average OSMO/wallet against user growth.
• Do wallets normally hold a majority of OSMO or another token? How has this changed over time?

Dashboard sections:

1) wallets and Assets 2) OSMO holders 3) OSMO balances 4) ratio of liquid to staked OSMO

Analysis date range: date>=2022-01-01 and date<=CURRENT_DATE-1 (2022-10-25) `Bounty link

👩‍💻Author

Gmail: ftmkhodabande@gmail.com

Tweeter: @busygirlcom

Discord: Jinx#6675

> Special thanks to my friend camp#4286 and SGH#8588

> # ✍️Conclusion > > The results showed that wallets mostly contain Osmo. Osmo stock distribution has been higher than other assets on all days. The noteworthy point is the increase in atomic values ​​from the beginning of May onwards. The average balance ($) for OSMO holders, HUAHUAV has decreased significantly over time. Since the beginning of May, the average balance ($) of OSMO per user has decreased. The noteworthy point is the increase in the average balance ($) per user in ATOM, AKT, and SECRT from the beginning of May onwards. > Of the top 100 OSMO holders at the beginning of the year, 96% are still in the top 100, and only 4% are not in the top 100. > Currently, the average OSMO per wallet is 1278. > From the beginning of the chart to December 15, 2021, the average OSMO per wallet has been trending upward. But since December 15, the average OSMO per wallet has been trending down. > The ratio of liquid to staked has been decreasing from December 15, 2021, to the end of February 2022. Since February 28, the trend of the chart has been bullish and has increased until May 6, 2022. After this date, with fluctuations, it has been in a downward trend until October 10.

Wallets and Assets

OSMO holders

OSMO balances

In this section, we considered liquid balance as on hold balance.

balance_type='liquid'

> # ==Do wallets normally hold a majority of OSMO, or another token?==

• Among the nine assets that have the most holders, Osmo is higher than other assets, with 374.3k. Also, Atom is in second place with 159.1k.

> # ==How has this changed over time?==

• The chart "Daily changes: Balance($) distribution on Osmosis - Normalized" shows that Osmo's balance distribution is higher than other assets on all days. The noteworthy point is the increase in Atom amounts from the beginning of May onwards.

• The following chart, "Daily changes: Avg balance($) per holder on Osmosis," shows that the average balance ($) for holders of OSMO, HUAHUAV has decreased significantly over time, other assets have not decreased much, and They have remained stable with slight fluctuations.

  \

• The "Daily changes: Avg balance($) per user on Osmosis - Normalized" area chart shows that since the beginning of May, the average balance($) of OSMO per user has decreased and it has been lower than before May. . Also, these values for HUAHUA have been decreasing since the beginning of April. The noteworthy point in this chart is the increase in the area of ATOM, AKT, and SECRT assets from the beginning of May onwards. And this shows an increase in the average balance ($) for each user in these assets.

  
  \

> # ==Are the top 100 OSMO holders the same now as they were at the start of the year?==

Of the top 100 OSMO holders at the beginning of the year, 96% are still in the top 100, and only 4% are not in the top 100.

The balance of the Top 10 OSMO Holders on Jan 1st, 2022, is also shown. The address "osmo1fl48vsnmsdzcv85q5d2q4z5ajdha8yu3aq6l09" is ranked higher than other addresses with 75.8M. This address has 1.6 times more inventory than the address after it.

Among these 96 addresses that are still among the top 100 holders, 89.6% of them have gotten worse than their previous rank, 6.25% of them have gotten better than their previous rank, and 4.17% of them have not changed. Meanwhile, the first, second, and third places at the beginning of the year still belong to the same addresses as before. The assets of the first ranked address("osmo1fl48vsnmsdzcv85q5d2q4z5ajdha8yu3aq6l09") increased from 75.8M to 218.7M (2.8x increase).

The balance of the second rank holder (osmo1jv65s3grqf6v6jl3dp4t6c9t9rk99cd80yhvld) has increased from 46.4M to 59.7M. Also, the balance of the third rank (osmo1pvxhtre74l37p6y2rs2e8xyek75z7xlc7g2trt) has decreased from 35.9M to 23.9M.

ratio of liquid to staked OSMO

> # ==How has the ratio of Liquid to staked OSMO changed overtime?== > > The ratio of liquid to staked has been decreasing from December 15, 2021 to the end of February 2022. Since February 28, the trend of the chart has been bullish and has increased until May 6, 2022. After this date, with fluctuations, it has been in a downward trend until October 10. But since October 10, the ratio of liquid to staked has increased with a very high slope until October 25, and this shows that the liquid was much more than staked during this period. 2.85 was the highest ratio (October 24, 2022). Although liquid values ​​have been higher than staked values, their ratio has been upward. In general, the average liquid balance is more than staked, and this difference has increased over time.

Maximum OSMO balance is 2.19M. The minimum balance of OSMO is 0.000001.

The total balance of OSMO is 520 million. Also, the total number of OSMO owners is 407 thousand users.

> # ==What is the current average OSMO per wallet?== > > Currently, the average OSMO per wallet is 1278.

==How has that value changed over time? Plot average OSMO/wallet against user growth.==

> From the beginning of the chart to December 15, 2021, the average OSMO in each wallet has been on an upward trend. But since December 15, the average OSMO per wallet has been trending down. Also, in the other section, you can see the growth of the user, which has had a slow upward trend from the beginning of the chart until December 15, 2021, but from December 15 onwards, the increase in the number of users increased, and over time, the number of users increases more steeply. On the other hand, with the increase in the number of users, the average OSMO per wallet has decreased. In the early days of March, the blue line (OSMO average per wallet) intersects the orange line (the number of users), and for the first time in this time frame, the orange line rises above the blue line.This difference has increased until today.