findings:

In this comparative analysis, we delve into the transactional aspects of Solana and Polygon, along with three other prominent blockchain chains – Arbitrum, Optimism, and Avalanche. Our focus centres on transactions, the number of users involved, and the fees paid over the past 31 days. Examining the number of transactions, Solana leads the pack with an impressive 544.25 million transactions over the past month. Polygon follows closely, securing the second position with 73 million transactions, while Arbitrum trails with 30 million transactions. The significant disparity in transaction counts, particularly with Solana's dominant lead, is evident. When we shift our attention to the number of users involved, Polygon takes the lead, with 4.93 million users participating in transactions. Arbitrum ranks second with 2.3 million users, while Solana holds the fourth spot, involving 1.17 million users. Considering the fees paid by users across these chains, Optimism emerges with the highest fee, totalling 3.5 million USD. Polygon stands in the third position, where users paid 1.9 million USD in fees. Notably, Solana occupies the last place in terms of fees, with users paying a total of 82.8k USD. The analysis challenges the claim in the tweet that Solana generates 2X more fees than Polygon. While Solana boasts the highest transaction number, Polygon records the most significant number of users engaged in transactions, and Optimism leads in terms of fee collection.

Solana Vs. Polygon Fees