Try Quests to earn cryptoHop In the Pool
These two charts make it obvious that headfirst transactions make up the majority of pool membership transactions.
Intriguingly, singleside pools began to expand around 2022, but practically all transactions took place headfirst before to then.
Perhaps in the future, there will be more singleside transactions than singlesides.
The cumulative graphic shows that while the number of single-side transactions is increasing over time, the number of headfirst transactions has plateaued. Additionally, the volatility chart shows that up until mid-2022, headfirst transactions were increasing and singleside volatility was negative, but after mid-2022, the pattern changed, and singleside transactions have been increasing ever since.
The majority of users, as well as the volume of transactions, are Headfirst users, which is primarily due to the single-side's lack of availability prior to 2022. nonetheless, the majority of users will be single-sided.(because we have no singleside user before 2022)
Prior to mid-2022, the number of headfirst users was increasing while the number of singleside users was steadily declining. However, since mid-2022, the number of users has essentially remained constant. (During the first six months of 2022, the majority of singleside users switched to headfisrt)
Even though there are more singleside users or transactions overall over time, headfirst users still generate far more USD than singleside users do.
Normal users shifted to singleside, but the whales are still diving headfirst, which implies.
and headfirst users account for the majority of the pools' volume.
As we can see, headfirst users make up the majority of the pool's volume. and sometimes some whales would deposit into the pools, increasing both assets.
Thus, even though singleside has seen an increase in users since 2022, whales are still joining pools by adding two assets.
The pools with most transaction counts is Osmo-Atom and it is obvious that in most of pools the majority of transactions are headfisrt,except OSMO-EVMOS(the reason is maybe this pool added after 2022 and from 2022 the users are more often using singleside method than headfirst)
Similar to the previous graph, OSMO-ATOM has the most users among the pools, and users almost exclusively entered the top 20 pools using the headfirst approach rather than the singleside way, with the exception of EVMOS-OSMO, which was added after 2022.
The USD volume difference between headfirst users and singleside users is greater than in the previous two charts. and the reason for that is that headfirst method is used by more whales than singleside. Additionally, the OSMO-EVMOS pool does not appear among the top 20 pools by USD volume.
As I previously stated, Headfirst users are more whales than Singleside users, and we can see that the bulk of Singleside method transactions are for users with less than $10.
but the users with less than 10$ in Headfirst are less than singleside.
The majority of singleside users only used the osmosis pools once, which is intriguing because headfirst users used the pools more frequently and the bulk of them used them between two and five times.and overall Headfirst users are more loyal to the pools.
IOV-ATOM is the first pool with the greatest volume of swaps in USD at more than $8 billion. and ATOM-OSMO makes up the second pool.
These three charts are based on the swaps table and the frequency with which swappers use the pools.
and this graph displays the USD volume of the top 100 utilized pools in relation to each other.
By far, ATOM-OSMO is the pool that receives the most exchanges. The reason for this is that ATOM and OSMO are the most significant tokens in the whole ecosystem and are widely used. USTC-OSMO is the second, as well. Because USTC delisted from OSMOSIS after Terra Collapse yet it is still present in Frontier OSMOSIS, it is possible that the majority of swaps are for before Terra Collapse.
This chart displays the average volume of swaps in pools, and it is obvious that USTC-DVPN has the largest normal swap size across the board.
Since the majority of transactions in the most utilized pool involve little sums, it is clear that they are not in the first positions on this chart.
however the top spots on this table are taken by the less well-known pools.
Introduction:
Osmosis is a new innovation of Decentralized Exchange built on an entirely different ecosystem. Decentralized Finance has continued to witness progressive innovations different from the existing ones. Osmosis is a decentralized exchange created by making use of the Cosmos SDK built on the Cosmos ecosystem a framework used for creating blockchains. Osmosis also adopts the use of the Automated Market Maker features enhancing liquidity on the cosmos system.
The Osmosis exchange was developed on public and open-source software that allows peer-to-peer transaction and allows trading of tokens accepted by the IBC. Users are allowed to access pools by making use of webs or mobile interfaces. So operations are not limited to the website alone but users must understand that they are responsible for the interfaces and fees. Osmosis exchange is highly volatile and users may experience fluctuation of token prices in their trading pair.[1]
In this dashboard we will study how users joining the pools on Osmosis and also we will analyze the swap depth of pools
Method:
In this dashboard I used 3 sections to show how users joined the pools and also the swap volume of pools include:
1-How users join the pools
2-Headfirst or singleside by different pools
3-The Depth of pools(or how frequently pools are used in swaps)
in the first section I used 3 parts:
1-Transaction numbers:
1-How users join pools on Osmosis?(Tx_count)
2-Headfirst or Singleside over time(tx_count)
3-Cumulative Headfirst or Singleside over time(tx_count)
4-Headfirst VS Singleside tx_count volatility percentage in 2022
5-Singleside users number of transactions on osmosis pools
6-Headfirst users number of transactions on osmosis pools
2-Unique users:
1-How Users join the pools(unique users)
2-Headfirst or Singleside over time(unique users)
3-Cumulative Headfirst or Singleside over time(Unique users)
4-Headfirst VS Singleside unique users volatility percentage in 2022
3-USD volume:
1-How users join pools on Osmosis?(USD volume)
2-Cumulative Headfirst or Singleside over time(USD volume)
3-Headfirst or Singleside over time(USD Volume)
4-Normalized Headfirst or Singleside over time(USD Volume)
5-Headfirst transactions USD volume
6-Singleside transactions USD volume
\n in the second section I mentioned these analysis:
1-How top 20 pools users join the pools?(Tx-count)
2-How top 20 pools users join the pools?(Number of unique users)
3-How top 20 pools users join the pools?(USD volume)
and in the last part I showed these charts and analysis:
1-The depth of top 100 pools by USD volume of swaps
2-The depth of top 100 pools by number of swaps
3-typical swap size in USD for top 100 pools
1-The bulk of pool membership transactions are headfirst transactions.Intriguingly, single-side pools started to grow about 2022, but prior to then, virtually all transactions happened head-first.There may be more singleside transactions than singlesides in the future.
2-While headfirst transactions have reached a peak, the number of single-side transactions has been rising over time. The volatility chart also reveals that singleside volatility was negative and headfirst transactions were growing up until mid-2022, but the trend shifted after that point and singleside transactions have been rising ever since.
3-Before the middle of 2022, headfirst users were becoming more prevalent while singleside users were progressively decreasing. The number of users has, however, virtually stayed consistent since mid-2022. (The bulk of singleside users migrated to headfisrt during the first half of 2022)
4-Headfirst users still make far more USD than singleside users do, even though there are often more singleside users or transactions.Normal users switched to singleside, but it suggests that the whales are still plunging headfirst.
The majority of the pools' volume is made up of headfirst users.
5-Osmo-Atom is the pool with the highest transaction counts, and with the exception of OSMO-EVMOS, it is clear that the bulk of transactions in most pools are headfirst (the reason is maybe this pool added after 2022 and from 2022 the users are more often using singleside method than headfirst)
[1]: