what is CHI(xaya)

CHI is the native cryptocurrency of the XAYA blockchain. It uses triple-purpose mining (PoW) for consensus. The total supply is 77.3 million CHI with about 55 million in circulation. Transactions and on-chain game moves are powered by CHI mining fees. CHI is now available in the ethereum ecosystem as WCHI. This does not affect the total supply.

Xaya allows the creation of unique tokens called Xaya Names which act as a decentralized ID or usernames in games.

The Xaya Electron wallet is the recommended wallet for gamers on the platform and for Windows users who wish to use Xaya Core!

Xaya is a blockchain and platform designed to solve the scalability issues associated with blockchains and in-particular for Decentralized Blockchain Gaming. The Xaya architecture strives for elegance through simplicity.

A game can then be played with an unlimited number of actions between them in real time. Once the game is over, the winner can prove this and receive the reward or points depending on how the game is designed. This method opens up the possibility for game genres that require fast real-time gameplay to be trustless and secured by blockchain technology, while also reducing blockchain bloat and transaction fees (there are no transaction fees in the channel). As channels do not interact with other channels, there is no limit on the number of parallel channels and this allows for almost unlimited throughput for game channel games. It is also worth noting that game channel games can be part of an overall fully on-chain game, e.g. a strategy game with game channel mini games, and the outcome can affect the state of the overall game, e.g. you attack another player on a strategic map, a real-time game follows, if you win, you take over the land. Similar to “Total War”-style games.

Developers wanting to build blockchain games are generally limited to the programming languages that they already know and can use. Using the Xaya SDK, it is possible to build games in almost any language the developer wishes. Although primarily written in C++, it is possible to use wrappers for many programming languages.

There are 3 primary components in the Xaya architecture:

1. Xaya Core Blockchain (or other base layer chain such as Ethereum or Polygon)
2. Game State Processor (GSP)
3. Front end (GUI)

The way that games work is simple and is as follows:

1. Players create special names (accounts) which are human readable and unique within the Xaya blockchain (or other chains using smart contracts)

2. Players make moves from these accounts by signing special transactions with the move data in them using their wallet. This is stored in the base chain.

3. The GSP processes all moves from each block for a particular game and computes the state of the game

4. The frontend receives the state from the GSP

   
   This approach is elegant and simple. There are no validators or complex systems in place, yet games and applications can run fully decentralized and are secured by the base layer blockchain.As illustrated above - there is of course a drawback to this configuration. Running a full node can be difficult or off-putting for most people due to the time to sync the chain and the size of it, and also the added complexity of having to run a separate wallet as well as the game. Also, it’s not possible to run a full node on most mobile phones, which limits the platforms Xaya games can run on given the above configuration. As a solution to this, we have developed and utilise open source applications and components so that players need not download the blockchain (for lite clients).

in this dashboard I want to analysis the CHI with top 3 stable coin as you see in this part can get just close to 1 percent of the transaction.

as you see by close to the 70 % transaction related to the USDT and after that USDC by near 22 % and after that DAI and at the end CHI.

as you see this number is not the large number but let see that this low amount can has impact on the total network or not,

and if has impact in which block this impact is in their large amount.

let start to the analysis.

in this dashboard I want to analysis the CHI performance and find the difference and similarity of them in the network.

the thing that I want to analysis is

• transaction number
• amount of the USD that in to them
• amount of the USD that out from them
• event type of the CHI
• amount of the swap
• amount of the EXCHANGE

in the first step as you see by the time number of the transaction that are about CHI by the time decrease up to Sep and after this date by low range this action increase,

and if you attention to the total network performance you can see that by the time this action be in the normal range,

so in this part we know that both of the CHI and ETH has no any impact on each other,

after this part I want to check the USD amount that in to the CHI and compare it with total network.

lets do it.

as you see in this part I want to analysis the amount of the USD that in to the token,

as you see from the 2020 by the time as a total view this amount decrease up to now and in the other hand you see that by the time total networks performance is opposed with the CHI,

so we understand that in this part there is no any relation with the CHI and total network,

for the better analysis lets check the opposed of this form.

the reaction of the CHI in this part is look like the previous part.

but as you see in the total network amount of the USD that out from TOTAL network is too more than previous part but we can say that all of them are in the same range.

so we get the same result from this part.

after this part I want to check the event type of the CHI and see the result of them, and again compare of the detail with total network.

so as you see in this part most of the transaction of the CHI related to the swap part by more than 95 % ,

and as you see just close to 2 % of the other related to the exchange.

so I want to analysis the detail by the time in the CHI network and compare it with ETH network and see the detail,

lets start.

in this part I want to analysis the swap amount of the CHI and compare it with the ETH total network.

as you see in this part transaction of the CHI that related to the swap by the time decrease and as you see this action is look like the transaction in the total view, but as you see in the end number o the transaction that related to the swap decrease.

and by see the detail we see that swap amount in the end of the 2020 and first of the 2021 up to middle were in their max but after this part you see that in this year this action decrease, and we can say that there is no any relation with the swap number of the total network, because ETH swap number is in the stable range.

so lets check the OPPOSED of this (exchange) in the last part.

conclusion

in this dashboard I analysis the XAYA and I get some result that they are:

• by compare of the top 3 stable coin with CHI we see that just 1 percent of the transaction related to the CHI
• transaction number of the XAYA by the time decrease up to Sep and after that increase by low level.
• by compare of the CHI and total network we see that both of the has no any relation in the transaction part.
• by analysis the amount of the USD that in to the both network we see that there is no any relation with the CHI and total network, and in this part we understand that amount of the USD that in to the CHI by the time increase.
• we get the same result (previous part) from amount of the USD that out from that but with a small difference, that is range of the ETH in the out amount is more than in amount
• like most of the token in the event type I see that most of the transaction related to the swap and after that related to the exchange
• swap amount in the end of the 2020 and first of the 2021 up to middle were in their max but after this, in this year this action decrease, and in this part I do not see any relation with the ETH.
• up to 4 Oct both of the ETH and CHI have the same reaction to the transaction number in the exchange, but after that amount of the exchange that related to the CHI was near zero(low amount).

thank you because of your attention

in this part as you know I want to analysis the exchange amount in the CHI and ETH network.

so as you see up to 4 Oct both of the ETH and CHI have the same reaction to the transaction number in the exchange but as you know in the range of the number they are not the same but in the range of the movement as you see both of the CHI and ETH have the same range and as you know this action up to 4 Oct is unalterable.

so after this part I want to close the text and speak about the result

lets finish this action.