City Amidst the Storm

    db_img
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...

    Solana Statistics

    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...
    Loading...

    In single numbers below I have brought up statics of block chains such as maximum and minimum and average and median of transactions per minute in two time frames.

    Polygon Statistics

    Ethereum Statistics

    Algorand Statistics

    Flow Statistics

    According to the charts and analyses reviewed in this part, the following results can be imagined

    From November first to 7th NEAR always had lower numbers of transactions compared to all other block chains except Osmosis, also from November 8th to 14th NEAR always had lower numbers of transactions compared to all other block chains except Osmosis.

    On last week’s chart Solana peeked on Nov 11th with 28K transactions per minute then decreased and had increasing trend on week before that.

    On last week’s chart Near peeked on Nov 9th with 591 transactions per minute then decreased and had same trend on week before that.

    On last week’s chart Polygon peeked on Nov 10th with 2,571 transactions per minute then decreased and had increasing trend on week before that.

    On last week’s chart Osmosis peeked on Nov 13th with 177 transactions per minute then decreased and had decreasing trend on week before that.

    On last week’s chart Algorand peeked on Nov 9th with 970 transactions per minute then decreased and had same trend on week before that.

    On last week’s chart Flow peeked on Nov 9th with 1,145 transactions per minute then decreased and had same trend on week before that.

    On last week’s chart Flow peeked on Nov 9th with 846 transactions per minute then decreased and had same trend on week before that.

    NEAR Statistics

    Osmosis Statistics

    From November first to November 7th

    • Highest maximum of transactions per minute belongs to Solana with 24.6K transactions per minute
    • Highest minimum of transactions per minute belongs to Solana with 21.1K transactions per minute
    • Highest average transactions per minute belongs to Solana with 21.6K average transactions per minute
    • Highest median of transactions per minute belongs to Solana with 22.1K median transactions per minute

    NEAR’s place among 7 blockchains :

    • maximum of transactions per minute: sixth place
    • minimum of transactions per minute: sixth place
    • average transactions per minute: sixth place
    • median of transactions per minute: sixth place

    so seems NEAR’s statistics are not in good place compared to other blockchains in time period of two weeks before

    From November 8th to November 14th

    • Highest maximum of transactions per minute belongs to Solana with 28.1K transactions per minute
    • Highest minimum of transactions per minute belongs to Solana with 22.9K transactions per minute
    • Highest average transactions per minute belongs to Solana with 25.8K average transactions per minute
    • Highest median of transactions per minute belongs to Solana with 25.7K median transactions per minute

    NEAR’s place among 7 blockchains :

    • maximum of transactions per minute: sixth place
    • minimum of transactions per minute: sixth place
    • average transactions per minute: sixth place
    • median of transactions per minute: sixth place

    so seems NEAR’s statistics are not in good place compared to other blockchains in time period of a week before

    Loading...
    Loading...

    As shown above NEAR, Solana, Osmosis and Flow are four blockchains that typically has high percentage of failed transactions and Ethereum and Polygon has lower.

    On time frame of two weeks before we see that Near has higher failed percentage of transactions than only Polygon and Ethereum but in last week’s time frame we see that Osmosis has been added to them and Near had higher failed percentage of transactions than Polygon, Ethereum and Osmosis.

    Conclusion

    • Near’s statistic has been higher only than Osmosis in both time frames.
    • By comparing statistics of both time frames of Near we can see that there has not been much changed compared to other block chains like Solana in which all 4 statistics of it increased in second week.
    • Failed transactions of most of block chains has been increasing in two weeks before but this has been decreasing in last week

    To create this dashboard I have used one of my previous created dashboards which is