Metric

1. Transactions daily percentage of success
2. Users Each Chains
3. total number of users each chains
4. daily Transactions
5. Transactions cumulative
6. Fees Across each Chains
7. Total Accumulated fee each and every Chain
8. Transactions on average, each block, across a variety of blockchains
9. Maximum number of transactions allowed in each block across several blockchains
10. Minimum Transactions Per Block Requirements on a Number of Different Chains
11. Average Time Taken per block
12. The distribution of times taken on average for each block

Analyze:

Optimism is one of the lowest performers in terms of this criterion, with just roughly 48% of its transactions being successful across chains.

However, it achieves greater results than avax.

Flow has the finest results in this regard.

Opti is ahead of avax by 6% more transactions in terms of the overall number of transactions than avax.

When compared to the fees paid on the other networks listed, it is quite evident that the fees paid on Optimism are far more than those paid on the other networks; avax comes in second.

PART 2. Block Performance

Analyze:

In this section, we will look at the number of users of these three networks in the last seven days.

According to the daily chart, it is quite clear that the number of Opti users on October 6 is almost double with forty one thousand users.

There have been Avax users, but over time, Avax users have been increasing since October 9th and have gained relative superiority.

The total number of users, but in this one week, in general, we can see the relative superiority of Optimism over Avax and Flow.

In the chart, it is quite clear that with Fifty-nine percent have more users in the network

conclusion🔰

In general, to compare the important metrics of the three Avalanche networks, Flow, Optimism, and the number of users We have checked the successful transactions and total transactions on these three networks The number of successful transactions on the Flow network has been more than others, optimism is in second place in this part. Optimisim, it Fee more for users among these three chains But the total number of users in Optimizm network has been more than other networks in the last three days despite the higher fee. In terms of performance, the block time produced in Optimism is lower than other mentioned networks, but on average, more transactions have happened in Avalanche blocks. Avalanche is the fastest network and next to optimism, the only network that does not pass any empty blocks between these three chains.

In this dashboard, I want to compare these three chain

Avax Optimism Flow

Methodology

We would be utilizing the transactions table to determine the percentage of successful completion across each chains. In addition to this, the table of transactions would be used to track daily users, cumulative users, daily transactions, cumulative transactions, daily fees, cumulative fees, the distribution of new users, and the distribution of transactions across chains.

The blocks table would be consulted in order to determine the average, maximum, and lowest number of transactions in a block. In addition to this, it will be used in the calculation of the average time taken between blocks, the average time taken throughout the course of time, and the distribution of the average time taken each block.

Analyze:

FLOW is now in first place for the most transactions in a single block, as it has about 870 transactions in a single block.

Optimism has a range of around 0.3-0.6 seconds, although it processes more blocks in a day when compared to Avalanche and Flow.

Only Optimism does not have any blocks with zero transactions, whereas all of the others need at least one transaction in each block to be zero.

The average amount of time between blocks for Avalanche is around 9.4 seconds, while the average amount of time for Optimism's blocks is less than one second.

Optimism executes a relatively small number of transactions inside each block, but it does it incredibly fast.