Jumper Exchange; Evoking Time and Power. (LI.FI Data Analytics Contest)

In this dashboard, Jumper Bridge from Optimism, Arbitrum, Base and Polygon networks has been investigated. Also, in the Tab (Jumper vs. others), a comparison of Jumper's performance with other bridges (**Layer3 Bridge**, **Metamask Bridge** and **Cube**) is discussed.

Bridge From Optimism

Optimism

In this section, bridge activities from Optimism network to other networks through jumper exchange have been investigated. Two bar charts show the number of bridge transactions, the number of unique users and the volume of bridges from Optimism to other networks according to the time and period you have chosen at top. In the charts (bridge per token) and (bridge per destination chain), the volume of transactions are shown according to the bridged tokens and the destination network. What is clear is that the largest bridge volume is related to the ETH token, followed by USDC. It seems that the largest volume of bridges were destined for Arbitrum and Base. Because on most days the charts of these two networks show higher numbers. But among the routers, users have paid more attention to Stargate and Across for the bridge from the source of Optimism. This shows that probably these two routers have been able to offer a lower or better exchange rate than other routers.

Bridge From Arbitrum

Arbitrum

As in the previous sections, two bar charts show the number of transactions, the number of users and the volume of transactions from Arbitrum according to the selected time period. In Arbitrum, ETH and WETH tokens have the largest volume of bridges to other networks. Also, the largest volume was bridged to Base and Linea networks. Also, for the bridge from the Arbitrum source, the Symbiosis and Across routers have been able to bridge more volume from the Arbitrum network.

Bridge From Base

Base

As in the previous sections, two bar graphs show the number of transactions, the number of users and the volume of transactions from the source Base according to the selected time period.

On a particular day (June 04), the bridge of $DOG token from the origin of Base (approximately worth 22.23 million USDC) to the destination of the BSC network caused the charts to deviate slightly from their normal form. But in general, the amount of bridged tokens is still related to ETH, and Across and Stargate have bridged the largest amount of tokens among other routers. Also, Linea and zkSync networks have been the most popular bridge destinations for users, and the largest volume of bridges has been for these two networks.

Bridge From Polygon

Polygon

As in the previous sections, two bar graphs show the number of transactions, the number of users and the volume of transactions from the source Polygon according to the selected time period.

Since the native token of the Polygon network is not ETH, it is not strange if the first rank of the bridge volume is not related to ETH. The largest amount of bridged tokens from the Polygon source is related to USDC and WETH tokens, and the Across, Celercircle and Cbridge routers have been able to transfer the largest amount of tokens for users. The most bridged volume is to Arbitrum and Ethereum, although the bridged volume to other networks such as Base is not significantly different.

In the upper part of the dashboard, you can change the period and time duration of the displayed results by selecting the period (daily, weekly, monthly or yearly) and selecting the start date and end date.