NEAR - 11. Tracking MarketingDAO Grants
QUESTION
The NEAR MarketingDAO is in need of a grants tracking dashboard to better monitor the outcome of grant requests from their treasury. Discussion around these requests happen on the NEAR forum, but the formal decision is a vote on AstroDAO, codifying the results on chain.
Examples of the votes can be found on the platform here: ____
\n
Once a proposal is approved via discussion on the NEAR forums, the team will submit a formal funding request on the AstroDAO platform.
\n
The analytics dashboard should track proposals and funding for the MarketingDAO's grants program. The necessary details, including the amount of funding and the target wallet are available in the proposal on AstroDAO.
\n
The dashboard should track the funds sent on the blockchain and display metrics such as:
\n
- number of grants approved,
- amount of funds disbursed over time
- project name(s)
- target wallets
- council member & votes
NEAR is a high-performance blockchain built without limits. Designed to be super-fast, incredibly secure, and infinitely scalable, NEAR allows anyone to build at scale and deploy at pace. “How the community decides to govern itself and organize around ideas is decided by the community through DAOs.”
“The biggest things we are all collectively trying to figure out are equitable distribution of resources, opportunities, participation in governance experiments and decentralized ownership of ecosystem responsibilities,
ANALYSIS
Highest number of proposals , 23 in number, are seen on September 28th2022
8 councils are visible on march15 , 2022. this is the highest count for councils . on most of the days validators counts are 1 & 2 but on September 26th, 2022 , 5 validators are seen & on September 28th 4 validators are seen .
highest votes are casted on January 7th 2022 , being 35 in number . Number of votes & voters are directly related which means means when more voters then more votes .
ANALYSIS
By analysing these charts & graphs we can say that there total of 348 votes rejected& 1599 votes approved . On 30th August 2022, 1 vote was finalized .On September 1st, 2 votes were finalized .
On February 24 2022 1 vote was removed .
There are blank days in between when there are no votes . From 12th October 20222 to December 7th 2022'.
In between only 324 votes were rejected on November 16th 2022.
The voting period continued till 22nd December . In the holiday period no voting is visible . Voting options are again visible after 7th January 2023.
Highest number of voters are seen on 24th February 2022. There are many days with spike in voters count . Highest number of voters who rejected the proposal are seen on March22, 2022
ANALYSIS
818 Votes were approved being 54.6% of total votes . Votes rejected are 169 with 48.8% share from total votes casted .
The ratio of approved to rejected is 81% approved, with a count of 149653
19% were rejected with 35103 count.
For all proposal id vote rejected is 4
Proposal id 185 has maximum approval 10.3% followed by proposal id 221 & 16 both with 12 % . proposal 414, 192 & 46 has about 10 % approval. proposal 332 & 232 both have about 6 % approval
TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO DAO
==ANALYSIS==
When we analyse the above charts we thar transfer activity is carried out mainly by alejandro.nearcount 743 count cryptocredit.near 875 count, whendacha.near 568 count, and so608.near with 382 counts . these 4 together are more than 90 % transfer of whole . Highest transfer is 25k by jcpacion.near .
ANALYSIS
While observing volume we came across the fact that the top 3 transferred volumes are sent by nf-payments.near with more than 25k volume alejandro.near with about 12k volume cryptocredit.near with about 4k volume . These 3 together makes more than 85% volume of the total volume transferred . Fourth & fifth position is held by Thegrace.near & james.near with 3k & 2.4 k volume respectively .
ANALYSIS
When we observe the weekly transfers by signer to metricsdao we can see maximum transfer activities are done in January end of 2022 & September beginning of 2022 .There were spikes on maximum days showing growth but on other days the transfer were less than 100 in number. Weekly volume transfer graph depicts that .maximum volume was transferred between November 2021 & October 2022 . Highest weekly volume was more than 10k.
DETAIL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
ANALYSIS
We can see the details description of each proposal is given in the table itself . We have discussed the wallet type also maximum proposal is from rubycop.near & blckhntr.near their near wallet address is also given alongside so that we can see we can the amount disbursed details of the wallet .
CONCLUSION
There are blank days in between when there are no votes .Highest number of voters are seen on 24th February 2022. There are many days with spike in voters count . Highest number of voters who rejected the proposal are seen on March22, 2022
The majority of new proposals are vote proposals followed by transfers proposals. The weekly percentage of proposals approved stays more or less similar as time passes. votes received by average proposal is 3 . Out of 603 propoals 488 is approved . At present there are 7 members in the council as 3 has been removed from total count of 10.The top 3 transferers make 85% of the total transfers. The top 4 users who have transferred to “marketing.sputnik-dao.near“ make up over 70% of all transfers .Majority of transfer volume to “marketing.sputnik-dao.near“ occurred in the beginning of 2022 in January . Users have transferred their maximum amount to marketing.sputnik-dao.near . About 36% of receiver ids have received multiple transfers via proposals. A total of 75.7k has been transferred via proposals and about 20% of that volume has gone to rubycop.near and blckhntr.near # credits to my friends mattkstew.
ANALYSIS
When we observe the proposal count it is amazing to note that maximum is null . maximum proposal is for vote type . Maximum amount of transfer is received by id blckhntr.near with 8130 near and rubycop.near with 8750 near these are followed by star-guild.sputnik-dao.near with 7.72% share .These 3 together are about 30 % of total transfer receiver . Most id’s are receiving a very negligible ratio. An interesting fact to be noted is that there is a single largest transfer by blckhntr.near whereas the second largest receiver rubycop.near has received more than 2 transfers . Maximum receiver has received the transfer once . About 36 % receiver id has received multiple transfers.
Analysis
We can analyse the share of voter by vote type. We can see vote approved by voter is more than 54 % & vote rejected is 36.4% vote removed & finalized are both more than 4%.
when we analyse the share of council by voting option we see 50% vote is accepted 40 % is rejected & 5 % is removed & finalized.
When we analyse the share of proposal by voting option we seemore than 78 % vote is approved 21 % is declined .4% is finalized % & .1 % is removed .
on analysis of vote by its voting option we see tha 82 % of the total vote is approved & 17 % is rejected vote finalizes is.15% & vote removed is .05%
On analysis of validator share we see vote rejected & accepted are equal with about 33% 22% is finalized % 11% is removed .